This post is supported by LogoArchive – The home of historical logos. Discover over 5000 of history’s greatest designs from the world’s finest designers. Updated every single day. Always find the logo inspiration you need for your next logo or branding project. Start here.
Abstract logos occupy a curious position within the history of corporate identity. Unlike figurative or pictorial logos, which derive meaning from recognisable objects, abstract symbols begin without an obvious explanation. Their meaning has to be built. They are empty vessels waiting to be filled.
This made abstraction particularly appealing to designers working during the early development of corporate identity in the post-war period. As businesses grew larger, more international and increasingly diversified, literal symbols could become restrictive. A manufacturer might become a technology company; a regional business might enter international markets. Simple geometry offered something more flexible.
By the 1950s and 1960s, Modernism had provided designers with a compelling visual vocabulary of circles, lines, grids and simplified geometric forms. Paul Rand’s 1960 Westinghouse symbol and Brownjohn, Chermayeff & Geismar’s octagonal mark for Chase Manhattan were expressions of this new approach. The latter was particularly radical. Few American corporations then identified themselves using entirely abstract symbols, yet the designers recognised that Chase’s substantial advertising resources could quickly establish an unfamiliar form in the public consciousness.
Abstraction also suited the increasingly international ambitions of corporations. When Deutsche Bank sought a new identity in the early 1970s, it wanted a symbol that could function globally, independent of written language. Selected from 140 proposals, Anton Stankowski’s 1974 ‘slash in a square’ reduced the bank to two elementary geometric gestures: a diagonal suggesting growth contained within a stable frame.
Yet the apparent simplicity of the abstract logo is deceptive. Without a familiar object to provide recognition, every relationship matters: the proportion of one shape to another, the character of a curve, the tension between positive and negative space, and the rhythm created through repetition.
The strongest logos imply or allude to rather than describe. A diagonal might suggest movement, intersecting forms collaboration, or an expanding geometry growth. Meaning remains sufficiently open to accommodate change.
Initially unfamiliar shapes can, through repeated exposure, become inseparable from the organisations they represent. Recognition gradually replaces explanation. Chase demonstrates this particularly well: a symbol once resisted by the bank’s own executives has remained at the centre of its identity for more than six decades.
This remains one of abstraction’s great strengths. An abstract logo does not necessarily say what a company makes or does. Instead, it provides an empty vessel into which reputation, experience and association can accumulate. Over time, geometry becomes identity, and a once unfamiliar arrangement of shapes can acquire a meaning far greater than the forms themselves.
Thank you for subscribing to Logo Histories. If you enjoy reading this short you may also enjoy these resources from the same team:
Brand Archive – Research tool for brand designers.
LogoArchive Website – Searchable modernist logo archive & research tool.
LogoArchive Shop – Vintage design books & LogoArchive Zines.
BP&O – Contemporary design editorial.